{"id":89839,"date":"2022-08-22T08:50:24","date_gmt":"2022-08-22T08:50:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/advanced-english-article-writing-homework-help\/"},"modified":"2022-08-22T08:50:24","modified_gmt":"2022-08-22T08:50:24","slug":"advanced-english-article-writing-homework-help","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/advanced-english-article-writing-homework-help\/","title":{"rendered":"Advanced english | Article writing homework help"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><u><strong>Instructions<\/strong><\/u><br \/>For this assignment, complete the following:<\/p>\n<p>Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and\/or your peers.<\/p>\n<p>Compose a position paper representing the pro side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Introduction (with thesis statement)<\/p>\n<p>Context paragraph<\/p>\n<p>3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 pros)<\/p>\n<p>Conclusion<\/p>\n<p>Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view &#8211; no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clich\u00e9s, and slang terminology.<\/p>\n<p>Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and headers.<\/p>\n<p>Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.<\/p>\n<p>Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.<\/p>\n<p><u><strong>Writing Requirements (APA format)<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n<p>Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)<\/p>\n<p>1-inch margins<\/p>\n<p>Double spaced<\/p>\n<p>12-point Times New Roman font<\/p>\n<p>Title page<\/p>\n<p>References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)<\/p>\n<p><u><strong>Grading<\/strong><\/u><br \/>This activity will be graded using the Pro-Position Paper Grading Rubric.\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Week 2 Assignment: Pro-Position Paper<\/h2>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/assignments\/1871162?module_item_id=7734206#\">Submit Assignment<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Due<\/strong> Sunday by 11:59pm<\/li>\n<li><strong>Points<\/strong> 125<\/li>\n<li><strong>Submitting<\/strong> a file upload<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Required Resources<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Read\/review the following resources for this activity:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Textbook: Chapter 3; pp. 100-107<\/li>\n<li>Lesson<\/li>\n<li>Week 1 Assignment<\/li>\n<li>Link (Word doc): <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/files\/6640731\/download?wrap=1\"><u>Pro-Paper Template<\/u><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Preview the document\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/BleZfrJ6-DehAw-gHbCrsl1LahDWTLRtvlUx2RLSJzQqoW_yZ4Uk4XFv3sZZfP7JYmOMq_ccnix9FkhkxoVbYfxmnNTotR6JLA5fs5t8gGUR3PoWWCApx_TAGhhBjfEJMUWaE7wb\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\"\/><\/li>\n<li>Minimum of 3 academic articles (from the Week 1 Assignment)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Apply the following writing resources to your posts:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Instructions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>For this assignment, complete the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and\/or your peers.<\/li>\n<li>Compose a position paper representing the <strong>pro<\/strong> side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:\n<ul>\n<li>Introduction (with thesis statement)<\/li>\n<li>Context paragraph<\/li>\n<li>3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 <strong>pros<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>Conclusion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view &#8211; no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clich\u00e9s, and slang terminology.<\/li>\n<li>Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and headers.<\/li>\n<li>Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.<\/li>\n<li>Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Writing Requirements (APA format)<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)<\/li>\n<li>1-inch margins<\/li>\n<li>Double spaced<\/li>\n<li>12-point Times New Roman font<\/li>\n<li>Title page<\/li>\n<li>References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Grading<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This activity will be graded using the Pro-Position Paper Grading Rubric.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Rubric<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Position Paper Grading Rubric &#8211; 125 pts (1)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Length<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Meets length requirement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Does not meet length requirement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>5.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Point Analysis<\/p>\n<p><strong>30.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>25.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is discernible and developed.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>22.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>18.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>30.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Support<\/p>\n<p><strong>30.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasive examples.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>25.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>22.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-developed or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>18.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is not well-supported by claims and\/or examples.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>30.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Organization<\/p>\n<p><strong>25.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper is clear and cohesive. Introduction and conclusion support the overall flow of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>21.25 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper is basically clear and well-organized with a minimum of non-related material present.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>18.75 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organization.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>15.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper lacks organization and has difficulty staying on track. Central themes are difficult to identify.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>25.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Writing: Mechanics &amp; Usage<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Clarity &amp; Flow<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety aids with the flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and\/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Voice<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing maintains third-person point of view\/objective voice throughout the entire text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>4.25 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing maintains third-person point of view\/objective voice throughout much of the text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>3.75 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing has some deviation from third-person point of view\/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>3.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing deviates significantly from third-person point of view\/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>5.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>APA Format<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>All sources are properly integrated and cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of integrating resources and APA format.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in integration and\/or citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in integration and\/or citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources are not properly integrated\/cited in the text\/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of the integration of resources and APA format.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>Total Points: 125.0<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/modules\/items\/7734204\">Previous<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2>Week 2 Assignment: Pro-Position Paper<\/h2>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/assignments\/1871162?module_item_id=7734206#\">Submit Assignment<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Due<\/strong> Sunday by 11:59pm<\/li>\n<li><strong>Points<\/strong> 125<\/li>\n<li><strong>Submitting<\/strong> a file upload<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Required Resources<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Read\/review the following resources for this activity:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Textbook: Chapter 3; pp. 100-107<\/li>\n<li>Lesson<\/li>\n<li>Week 1 Assignment<\/li>\n<li>Link (Word doc): <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/files\/6640731\/download?wrap=1\"><u>Pro-Paper Template<\/u><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Preview the document\" height=\"16\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/BleZfrJ6-DehAw-gHbCrsl1LahDWTLRtvlUx2RLSJzQqoW_yZ4Uk4XFv3sZZfP7JYmOMq_ccnix9FkhkxoVbYfxmnNTotR6JLA5fs5t8gGUR3PoWWCApx_TAGhhBjfEJMUWaE7wb\" width=\"16\"\/><\/li>\n<li>Minimum of 3 academic articles (from the Week 1 Assignment)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Apply the following writing resources to your posts:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Instructions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>For this assignment, complete the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and\/or your peers.<\/li>\n<li>Compose a position paper representing the <strong>pro<\/strong> side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:\n<ul>\n<li>Introduction (with thesis statement)<\/li>\n<li>Context paragraph<\/li>\n<li>3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 <strong>pros<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>Conclusion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view &#8211; no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clich\u00e9s, and slang terminology.<\/li>\n<li>Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and headers.<\/li>\n<li>Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.<\/li>\n<li>Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Writing Requirements (APA format)<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)<\/li>\n<li>1-inch margins<\/li>\n<li>Double spaced<\/li>\n<li>12-point Times New Roman font<\/li>\n<li>Title page<\/li>\n<li>References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Grading<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This activity will be graded using the Pro-Position Paper Grading Rubric.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Rubric<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Position Paper Grading Rubric &#8211; 125 pts (1)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Length<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Meets length requirement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Does not meet length requirement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>5.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Point Analysis<\/p>\n<p><strong>30.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>25.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is discernible and developed.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>22.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>18.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>30.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Support<\/p>\n<p><strong>30.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasive examples.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>25.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>22.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-developed or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>18.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The central idea is not well-supported by claims and\/or examples.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>30.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Organization<\/p>\n<p><strong>25.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper is clear and cohesive. Introduction and conclusion support the overall flow of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>21.25 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper is basically clear and well-organized with a minimum of non-related material present.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>18.75 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organization.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>15.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Paper lacks organization and has difficulty staying on track. Central themes are difficult to identify.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>25.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Writing: Mechanics &amp; Usage<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Clarity &amp; Flow<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety aids with the flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and\/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>Voice<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing maintains third-person point of view\/objective voice throughout the entire text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>4.25 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing maintains third-person point of view\/objective voice throughout much of the text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>3.75 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing has some deviation from third-person point of view\/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>3.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The writing deviates significantly from third-person point of view\/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>5.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/p>\n<p>APA Format<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>All sources are properly integrated and cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of integrating resources and APA format.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in integration and\/or citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.5 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in integration and\/or citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources are not properly integrated\/cited in the text\/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of the integration of resources and APA format.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>0.0 pts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No effort<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>10.0 pts<\/p>\n<p>Total Points: 125.0<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/modules\/items\/7734204\">Previous<\/a><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chamberlain.instructure.com\/courses\/60471\/modules\/items\/7734208\">Next<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0\u00a0 InstructionsFor this assignment, complete the following: Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and\/or your peers. Compose a position paper representing the pro side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89839\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}