{"id":6708,"date":"2021-10-10T14:14:51","date_gmt":"2021-10-10T14:14:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/evaluate-a-modern-u-s-supreme-court-criminal-case-2005-or-later-crj-514-constitutional-judicial-processes-ashford-university\/"},"modified":"2021-10-10T14:14:51","modified_gmt":"2021-10-10T14:14:51","slug":"evaluate-a-modern-u-s-supreme-court-criminal-case-2005-or-later-crj-514-constitutional-judicial-processes-ashford-university","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/evaluate-a-modern-u-s-supreme-court-criminal-case-2005-or-later-crj-514-constitutional-judicial-processes-ashford-university\/","title":{"rendered":"Evaluate a modern u.s. supreme court criminal case, 2005 or later | CRJ 514 Constitutional &#038; Judicial Processes | Ashford University"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Analyze a criminal case opinion issued by the U.S. Supreme Court, 2005 or later; explain the issue(s) in the case, the holding of the case, its basis, the number of justices for and against the opinion, and whether it set precedent (i.e., new law) or merely reaffirmed long-standing constitutional values. Identify the justice who authored the opinion, and provide that justice\u2019s ideology. You may choose any case listed below, or locate a criminal U.S. Supreme Court case, 2005 or later, to analyze. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words.<\/p>\n<h2>Required Resources<\/h2>\n<h3>Text<\/h3>\n<p>Spohn, C., &amp; Hemmens, C. (2012).\u00a0 <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/ashford.instructure.com\/courses\/91166\/external_tools\/retrieve?display=borderless&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DSpohn.9093.17.1\"><u><em>Courts: A text\/reader<\/em><\/u><\/a> \u00a0(2nd ed.). Sage.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Section V: Pretrial Proceedings<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Website<\/h3>\n<p>United States Courts. (n.d.). <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/FederalCourts\/UnderstandingtheFederalCourts\/HowCourtsWork\/CriminalCases.aspx\"><u>Criminal cases\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/FederalCourts\/UnderstandingtheFederalCourts\/HowCourtsWork\/CriminalCases.aspx<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The article provides an outline of federal criminal procedure, from arraignment through sentencing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Recommended Resources\u00a0<\/h2>\n<h3>Articles<\/h3>\n<p>Owens, R. J., &amp; Wedeking, J. P. (2011). Justices and legal clarity: Analyzing the complexity of U.S. Supreme Court opinions.<em>Law &amp; Society, 45<\/em>(4), 1027-1061. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The full-text version of this article is available in the ProQuest database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. This article provides an examination of the significance of clarity in legal decisions and explains the liabilities for a lack of legal clarity in U.S. Supreme Court rulings.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Smith, C. E., McCall, M., &amp; McCall, M. (2006). Criminal justice and the 2004-2005 United States Supreme Court term.<em>The University of Memphis Review, 36<\/em>(4). Retrieved from http:\/\/www.memphis.edu\/law\/lawreview.php<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The full-text version of this article is available in the ProQuest database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. A detailed analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court and its transition from the \u201cRehnquist Court\u201d to the \u201cRoberts Court.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Multimedia<\/h3>\n<p>Ishmael, P. [Patrick Ishmael]. (2012, May 14).\u00a0 <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=_4n8gOUzZ8I\"><u><em>Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer debate the Constitution\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/em><\/u><\/a> \u00a0[Video file]. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=_4n8gOUzZ8I<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This video clip of an interview with the two justices provides insights into their reasoning and rulings on the U.S. Supreme Court.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Legal Materials<\/h3>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_05_5966\"><u>Clark v. Arizona\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 548 U.S. 735 (2006).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the insanity defense. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_05_5966<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2010\/2010_09_11328\"><u>Davis v. United States\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 131 S. Ct. 2419 (2011).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the admissibility of an illegal search. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_1224<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_05_5224\"><u>Davis v. Washington\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 547 U.S. 813 (2006).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the admissibility of a 911 call at trial. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_05_5224<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_1175\"><u>Florida v. Powell\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 559 U.S. 50 (2010).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about Miranda warnings. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_1175<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_07_6053\"><u>Giles v. California\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 554 U.S. 353 (2008).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the admissibility of a dead victim\u2019s statements in a trial. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_07_6053<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_7412\"><u>Graham v. Florida\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 560 U.S. 48 (2010).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about whether a life sentence for juveniles violate the Eighth Amendment. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_7412<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_07_330\"><u>Greenlaw v. United States\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 554 U.S. 237 (2008).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about whether a court can enhance sentences without a prosecutor request. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_07_330<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2008\/2008_07_513\"><u>Herring v. United States\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 555 U.S. 135 (2009).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about erroneous search warrants requiring suppression of evidence. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2008\/2008_07_513<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_04_1327\"><u>Holmes v. South Carolina\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 547 U.S. 319 (2006).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about excluding defense evidence. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_04_1327<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_04_1360\"><u>Hudson v. Michigan\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 547 U.S. 586 (2006).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the Fourth Amendment and the \u201cknock and announce\u201d rule. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_04_1360<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2010\/2010_09_11121\"><u>J.D.B. v. North Carolina\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 131 S. Ct. 2394 (2011).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about whether age matters for Miranda warnings. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2010\/2010_09_11121<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_07_343\"><u>Kennedy v. Louisiana\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 554 U.S. 407 (2008).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the death penalty for child rape. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_07_343<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2012\/2012_11_207\"><u>Maryland v. King\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 133 S. Ct. 1958 (2013).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about DNA collections for database upon mere arrest. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2012\/2012_11_207<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_1521\"><u>McDonald v. Chicago\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 561 U.S. 742 (2010).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about gun rights. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2009\/2009_08_1521<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2012\/2012_11_1425\"><u>Missouri v. McNeely\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 133 S. Ct. 1552 (2013).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about police drawing blood without a warrant for driving under the influence. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2012\/2012_11_1425<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_04_928\"><u>Oregon v. Guzek\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 546 U.S. 517 (2006).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about death sentence evidence. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_04_928<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2012\/2012_12_246\"><u>Salinas v. Texas\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 133 S. Ct. 2174 (2013).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about the Fifth Amendment\u2019s protection of silence before arrest or Miranda rights. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2012\/2012_12_246<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_05_352\"><u>United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about a defendant\u2019s right to have a chosen lawyer. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2005\/2005_05_352<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2011\/2011_10_1259\"><u>United States v. Jones\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about whether a warrantless tracking of a car violates the Fourth Amendment. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2010-2019\/2011\/2011_10_1259<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_06_694\"><u>United States v. Williams\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 553 U.S. 285 (2008).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about whether child pornography is protected by free speech. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2007\/2007_06_694<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2008\/2008_08_67\"><u>Yeager v. United States\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/u><\/a>, 557 U.S. 110 (2009).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This case highlights information about <em>double jeopardy<\/em>. It can be retrieved from http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/2000-2009\/2008\/2008_08_67<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 \u00a0 Analyze a criminal case opinion issued by the U.S. Supreme Court, 2005 or later; explain the issue(s) in the case, the holding of the case, its basis, the number of justices for and against the opinion, and whether it set precedent (i.e., new law) or merely reaffirmed long-standing constitutional values. Identify the justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6708","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-homework-help"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6708"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6708\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6708"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}