{"id":47471,"date":"2022-03-31T23:20:59","date_gmt":"2022-03-31T23:20:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/psych-660-case-study-one-worksheet\/"},"modified":"2022-03-31T23:20:59","modified_gmt":"2022-03-31T23:20:59","slug":"psych-660-case-study-one-worksheet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/psych-660-case-study-one-worksheet\/","title":{"rendered":"Psych 660 case study one worksheet"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p><span>Dr. Eduardo Romaro, a clinically trained forensic ps<\/span><span>ychologist, was retained by the prosecution <\/span><span>to evaluate the intellectual competence of John Stone, a 50-ye<\/span><span>ar-old <\/span><span>man convicted of first-degree murder of a guard <\/span><span>during a bank robbery. John had <\/span><span>cla<\/span><span>imed he was innocent throughout <\/span><span>the trial. In t<\/span><span>he state in which the trial was <\/span><span>conducted, individuals convicted of such an offense<\/span><span> face the death penalty. John\u2019s <\/span><span>attorney challenged the death penalty option for his clie<\/span><span>nt, claiming that the defendant <\/span><span>is intellectually disabled. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in <\/span><em><span>Atkins v. <\/span><\/em><em><span>Virginia<\/span><\/em><span>(2002) that the execution of those with intellectua<\/span><span>l disability (formerly known as <\/span><span>mental retardation) is unconstitutional. Dr. Romaro <\/span><span>had worked with the prosecution <\/span><span>before on intellectual disability cases, but thi<\/span><span>s is the first time he had been <\/span><span>retained for a capital punishment case. He is pers<\/span><span>onally ambivalent about whether <\/span><span>states should implement the death penalty.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The psychologist meets John in a private room <\/span><span>in the prison and administers a <\/span><span>battery of intellectual and adaptive behavior tests wi<\/span><span>th proven psychometric validity <\/span><span>for determining forensically relevant intellectual ability. Just as <\/span><span>he ends the formal <\/span><span>test administration, John becomes distraught<\/span><span> and appears to be experiencing <\/span><span>an anxiety attack. In his distress the psychologis<\/span><span>t hears the prisoner repeatedly <\/span><span>asking God for forgiveness for killing the guard and for murdering another pers<\/span><span>on, <\/span><span>who he keeps calling \u201cthe boy waiting for the bus.\u201d <\/span><span>The psychologist shifts into an <\/span><span>emergency crisis intervention mode to help calm the defendant and rings for assistance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Dr. Romaro was shocked to hear John \u201cconfe<\/span><span>ss\u201d not only to the bank murder <\/span><span>but also to the murder of a \u201cboy waiting for a bus.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The <em>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders<\/em>, fourth edition<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>(<em>DSM-IV-TR<\/em>) diagnosis of intellectual disability (curre<\/span><span>ntly termed \u201cmental retardation <\/span><span>developmental disability\u201d) requires that individ<\/span><span>uals demonstrate significantly <\/span><span>sub-average intellectual functioning, impai<\/span><span>rments in adaptive functioning, <\/span><span>and <em>onset before 18 years of age<\/em>. Similarly, the state stand<\/span><span>ard for intellectual disability <\/span><span>includes a developmental history of intellectual impairmen<\/span><span>t. Prior to testing, <\/span><span>Dr. Romaro had asked the prosecutor for all avail<\/span><span>able childhood mental health or <\/span><span>school records to determine if John meets these <\/span><span>criteria. No formal educational <\/span><span>or psychological evaluations were included in<\/span><span> the materials he received. The <\/span><span>records indicated that John had a poor academi<\/span><span>c record, was retained in fifth <\/span><span>grade, was suspended several times for comin<\/span><span>g to school drunk, and had left <\/span><span>school when he was 15. State criteria also inclu<\/span><span>de an IQ score less than 70 and <\/span><span>poor adaptive skills.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>That evening Dr. Romaro scores the test battery. John\u2019s <\/span><span>IQ score is 71, his performance <\/span><span>on other cognitive tests fell close to the intel<\/span><span>lectual disability cutoff score <\/span><span>(some above, some below). His adaptive functionin<\/span><span>g score is a standard deviation <\/span><span>below average. However, given the prisoner\u2019s age,<\/span><span> without a more detailed set of <\/span><span>childhood records, it is difficult to clearly conclude that he meets the <em>DSM-IV-TR<\/em><\/span><span>or state legal criteria for intellectual disability. D<\/span><span>r. Romaro had not been asked to <\/span><span>administer assessments for mood, schizophrenia, or<\/span><span> other psychotic disorders that <\/span><span>might impair intellectual and adaptive performance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong><span>Ethical Dilemma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span>Dr. Romaro is not sure what forensic opinion to give regarding whether or not<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>John meets the legal criteria for intellectual disability. Without evidenc<\/span><span>e of intellectual <\/span><span>disability in his youth, a diagnosis of intellectual<\/span><span> disability may not be possible <\/span><span>and, thus, could not be used to support John\u2019s d<\/span><span>eath penalty appeal. He is also <\/span><span>unsure whether he has an ethical responsibility to include in his report J<\/span><span>ohn\u2019s <\/span><span>\u201cconfession\u201d or John\u2019s statement about the \u201cboy waiting for a bus.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Respond to the following questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span>Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span>How might Dr. Romaro\u2019s ambivalence toward the death penalty influence his decision to offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability? How might John\u2019s \u201cconfession\u201d or his comment about the \u201cboy waiting for the bus\u201d influence the decision? To what extent should these factors play a role in Dr. Romaro\u2019s report?<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span>How are APA Ethical Standards 2.0f, 3.06, 4.04, 4.05, 5.01, 9.01a and 9.06 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span>What steps should Dr. Romaro take to ethically implement his decision and monitor its effect?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong><span>Reference<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span>Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dr. Eduardo Romaro, a clinically trained forensic psychologist, was retained by the prosecution to evaluate the intellectual competence of John Stone, a 50-year-old man convicted of first-degree murder of a guard during a bank robbery. John had claimed he was innocent throughout the trial. In the state in which the trial was conducted, individuals convicted [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47471\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}