{"id":23232,"date":"2022-01-06T05:34:46","date_gmt":"2022-01-06T05:34:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/phil-201-quiz-2-physiology-homework-help\/"},"modified":"2022-01-06T05:34:46","modified_gmt":"2022-01-06T05:34:46","slug":"phil-201-quiz-2-physiology-homework-help","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/phil-201-quiz-2-physiology-homework-help\/","title":{"rendered":"Phil 201 quiz 2 | Physiology homework help"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Question 1\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The three parts of an argument are \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0_____________, inference, and conclusion:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

    truth value<\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n

    premises<\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n

    deduction<\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n

    reasoning<\/p>\n

    3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

    Question 2\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. The law of excluded middle states<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

      something cannot \u00a0\u00a0both be and not be at the same time<\/p>\n

      \u00a0<\/p>\n

      the middle term \u00a0\u00a0must be distributed in the premises at least once<\/p>\n

      \u00a0<\/p>\n

      something either is \u00a0\u00a0or is not<\/p>\n

      \u00a0<\/p>\n

      something is what \u00a0\u00a0it is<\/p>\n

      3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

      Question 3\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. According to the reading, even God \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0cannot create a contradiction.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        True\u00a0<\/p>\n

        False\u00a0<\/p>\n

        3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

        Question 4\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. A mixed hypothetical syllogism in \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0which the premise denies the consequent is called:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

          Modus ponens<\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          Categorical<\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          Disjunctive<\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          Modus tollens<\/p>\n

          3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

          Question 5\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. The Latin phrase that means \u2018it \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0does not follow\u2019 is:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

            3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

            Question 6\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. This may be the most well-known \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0fallacy of presumption:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

              bifurcation<\/p>\n

              \u00a0<\/p>\n

              red-herring<\/p>\n

              \u00a0<\/p>\n

              begging the question<\/p>\n

              \u00a0<\/p>\n

              hasty generalization<\/p>\n

              3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

              Question 7\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. This fallacy is sometimes referred \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0to as the false dilemma:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                straw man<\/p>\n

                \u00a0<\/p>\n

                bifurcation<\/p>\n

                \u00a0<\/p>\n

                red herring<\/p>\n

                \u00a0<\/p>\n

                special pleading<\/p>\n

                3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                Question 8\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Identify the fallacy: The Bible \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0says we should do to others what we would have them to do for us. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Therefore I have no problem sharing the questions and answers of this quiz \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0with another student.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                  special pleading<\/p>\n

                  \u00a0<\/p>\n

                  tu quogue<\/p>\n

                  \u00a0<\/p>\n

                  sweeping \u00a0\u00a0generalization<\/p>\n

                  \u00a0<\/p>\n

                  red herring<\/p>\n

                  3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                  Question 9\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. \u201cBegging the question\u201d is a \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0fallacy of presumption.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    True\u00a0<\/p>\n

                    False\u00a0<\/p>\n

                    3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                    Question 10\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Identify the fallacy: He’s the \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0third student I’ve caught cheating on the test. It just proves that you \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0can’t trust students these days.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                      hasty \u00a0\u00a0generalization<\/p>\n

                      \u00a0<\/p>\n

                      straw man<\/p>\n

                      \u00a0<\/p>\n

                      ad hominem<\/p>\n

                      \u00a0<\/p>\n

                      division<\/p>\n

                      3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                      Question 11\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Occam\u2019s razor says:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                        the best explanation is usually \u00a0\u00a0philosophical<\/p>\n

                        \u00a0<\/p>\n

                        the best argument is usually \u00a0\u00a0comprehensive<\/p>\n

                        \u00a0<\/p>\n

                        the strongest argument is usually the \u00a0\u00a0positive\/negative approach<\/p>\n

                        \u00a0<\/p>\n

                        the simplest explanation is usually \u00a0\u00a0the best<\/p>\n

                        3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                        Question 12\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. The principle of simplicity says \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0we should try to simplify complex arguments.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          True\u00a0<\/p>\n

                          False\u00a0<\/p>\n

                          3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                          Question 13\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. A best explanation approach is \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0often the best way to argue because many issues in philosophy do not have \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0perfect solutions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            True\u00a0<\/p>\n

                            False\u00a0<\/p>\n

                            3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                            Question 14\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Which of the following should we \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0do first in our analysis of the \u2018validity\u2019 of an argument?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                              determine if these \u00a0\u00a0premises lead to this conclusion<\/p>\n

                              \u00a0<\/p>\n

                              determine if the \u00a0\u00a0premises are true<\/p>\n

                              \u00a0<\/p>\n

                              determine if there \u00a0\u00a0are any informal fallacies<\/p>\n

                              \u00a0<\/p>\n

                              determine if we \u00a0\u00a0agree with the conclusion before evaluating the validity or strength of the argument<\/p>\n

                              3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                              Question 15\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. The term for beliefs relating \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0together in a way that is mutually supportive:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                consistency<\/p>\n

                                \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                coherence<\/p>\n

                                \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                comprehensive<\/p>\n

                                \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                constancy<\/p>\n

                                3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                Question 16\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. An inference drawn from \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0statistical reasoning is deductive.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  True\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                  False\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                  3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                  Question 17\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. In a deductive syllogism, if the \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0premises are true and the conclusion is true, then the argument is valid.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    True\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                    False\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                    3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                    Question 18\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. The formal procedure for writing \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0out a deductive argument is called<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                      an analogy<\/p>\n

                                      \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                      a syllogism<\/p>\n

                                      \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                      a hypothesis<\/p>\n

                                      \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                      a formulation<\/p>\n

                                      3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                      Question 19\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Type of argument that begins with \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0a problem with an unknown explanation, forms a theory and tests the \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0theory.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                        deductive syllogism<\/p>\n

                                        \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                        probability calculus<\/p>\n

                                        \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                        hypothetical reasoning<\/p>\n

                                        \u00a0<\/p>\n

                                        statistical reasoning<\/p>\n

                                        3 points \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                        Question 20\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. An argument may be evaluated as \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u201ctrue\u201d or \u201cfalse.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          True\u00a0<\/p>\n

                                          False\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          \u00a0\u00a0 Question 1\u00a0 The three parts of an argument are \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0_____________, inference, and conclusion: \u00a0\u00a0 truth value \u00a0 premises \u00a0 deduction \u00a0 reasoning 3 points \u00a0\u00a0 Question 2\u00a0 The law of excluded middle states \u00a0\u00a0 something cannot \u00a0\u00a0both be and not be at the same time \u00a0 the middle term \u00a0\u00a0must be distributed in the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}