{"id":19771,"date":"2021-12-02T10:42:10","date_gmt":"2021-12-02T10:42:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/politics-administration-dichotomy-management-homework-help\/"},"modified":"2021-12-02T10:42:10","modified_gmt":"2021-12-02T10:42:10","slug":"politics-administration-dichotomy-management-homework-help","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/politics-administration-dichotomy-management-homework-help\/","title":{"rendered":"Politics-administration dichotomy | Management homework help"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In 750-1,000 words, do the following:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Describe the politics-administration dichotomy.<\/li>\n<li>Explain both sides of the debate on whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory. Give specific real-world examples in your debate.<\/li>\n<li>Describe what side you tend to agree with more and why.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Use two to four scholarly resources to support your explanations.<\/p>\n<p>Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.<\/p>\n<p>This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.<\/p>\n<p>You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.<\/p>\n<p>Rubrics :<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<strong>Politics-Administration Dichotomy<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>1<br \/>Unsatisfactory<br \/>0.00%<\/p>\n<p>2<br \/>Less than Satisfactory<br \/>74.00%<\/p>\n<p>3<br \/>Satisfactory<br \/>79.00%<\/p>\n<p>4<br \/>Good<br \/>87.00%<\/p>\n<p>5<br \/>Excellent<br \/>100.00%<\/p>\n<p><strong>70.0 %Content<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>20.0 %Describe the politics-administration dichotomy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is missing.<\/p>\n<p>Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is vague and inconsistent.<\/p>\n<p>Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is present and supported by some research.<\/p>\n<p>Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is present, clear, and supported by research.<\/p>\n<p>Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is clear, concise, and supported by research.<\/p>\n<p><strong>25.0 %Explain both sides of the debate on whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory. Give specific real-world examples in your debate.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are missing. Real-world examples in student&#8217;s debate are also missing.<\/p>\n<p>Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are vague and inconsistent. Real-world examples in student&#8217;s debate are also vague.<\/p>\n<p>Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are present and supported by research. Real-world examples in student&#8217;s debate are also present.<\/p>\n<p>Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are present, clear, and supported by research. Real-world examples in your debate are also present and clear.<\/p>\n<p>Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are clear, concise, and supported by research. Real-world examples in your debate are also clear and concise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>25.0 %Describe what side you tend to agree with more and why.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is missing.<\/p>\n<p>Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is vague and inconsistent.<\/p>\n<p>Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is present.<\/p>\n<p>Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is present, clear, and supported by research.<\/p>\n<p>Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is clear, concise, and supported by research.<\/p>\n<p><strong>20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/p>\n<p>Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/p>\n<p>Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/p>\n<p><strong>8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/p>\n<p>Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/p>\n<p>Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/p>\n<p>Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n<p>Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/p>\n<p>Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.<\/p>\n<p>Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/p>\n<p>Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.<\/p>\n<p>Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.0 %Format<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/p>\n<p>Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/p>\n<p>Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/p>\n<p>Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/p>\n<p>All format elements are correct.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sources are not documented.<\/p>\n<p>Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/p>\n<p>Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/p>\n<p>Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/p>\n<p>Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/p>\n<p><strong>100 %Total Weightage<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 In 750-1,000 words, do the following: Describe the politics-administration dichotomy. Explain both sides of the debate on whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory. Give specific real-world examples in your debate. Describe what side you tend to agree with more and why. Use two to four scholarly resources to support [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19771","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-homework-help"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19771"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}