{"id":132868,"date":"2023-09-14T02:49:15","date_gmt":"2023-09-14T02:49:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/perev-computer-science-homework-help\/"},"modified":"2023-09-14T02:49:15","modified_gmt":"2023-09-14T02:49:15","slug":"perev-computer-science-homework-help","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/perev-computer-science-homework-help\/","title":{"rendered":"Perev | Computer Science homework help"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Dear Mikayla,
\n\tThanks for posting your peer review in the discussion thread and letting me review it! I hope the feedback I provide is useful and can be used in your final draft.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The peer reviewer formats their review as a letter.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The reviewer starts by thanking the writer. This shows goodwill and indicates that the reviewer sees their job as constructive.<\/p>\n

\tYour first paragraph is good. You introduce and explain what exactly \u201cStan Twitter\u201d is and how one would be able to join said community. I also found your transition into the next paragraph to work pretty well, but maybe you could put the last sentence of the first paragraph as the first sentence of the second paragraph? I personally think it\u2019d flow better, but that\u2019s a matter of opinion. Also, after reading the first paragraph of your report, your reader should know what exactly you\u2019re going to be talking about. You talk a lot about what \u201cStan Twitter\u201d is, but don\u2019t really go in depth about what you plan on discussing. Are you just detailing what \u201cStan Twitter\u201d is along with a couple of their communication methods? Or are you planning on connecting \u201cStan Twitter\u201d with other Twitter communities? Maybe you can explicitly say what you plan on talking about. Reduces confusion and makes it more readable.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The reviewer not only praises a success, but is specific about WHY the strategy was successful.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The peer reviewer asks questions to help spur the writer to think about their purpose and goals for the draft.\tComment by Glenn Lester: “Maybe” and “personally” indicates that the peer reviewer is looking for possibilities.<\/p>\n

\tIn your second paragraph, you explain what Carrds are, and you do it pretty well. You don\u2019t really cover how they\u2019re important to the community as a whole, though. I know they\u2019re used to give people an idea about who you are and what you \u201cstan\u201d, but why is it important to know? Explaining its importance to the reader by giving examples of how people may use them would, in my opinion, be beneficial. \tComment by Glenn Lester: The peer reviewer is specific about location in the draft.<\/p>\n

\tI now see that your third paragraph answers all of my concerns about your second paragraph. Maybe instead of having them being two separate paragraphs, you fuse them together somehow? I don\u2019t mean remove the spaces in between the paragraphs and call it a day, I mean sprinkle the information of the third paragraph through the second so you\u2019re both giving examples and explaining.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The peer reviewer shows that they are on the writer’s side, and giving them the benefit of the doubt.<\/p>\n

\tYour fourth and final paragraphs seem out of place and (potentially) unfinished. The fourth paragraph discusses support for the celebrity, but it\u2019s only a few sentences long and doesn\u2019t clearly solidify its purpose in the paper. The final paragraph is, I\u2019m assuming, your conclusion. You discuss Carrds quite a bit and also how they could be used in discourse communities. I\u2019d recommend summing up the entire paper in the first one to two sentences, then discussing how Carrds can be used in other discourse communities, including specific examples where they could be used. Your ending sentence is also fairly generic, maybe make it relate back to your subject, like \u201cAlthough Stan Twitter is rather new and difficult to understand, other discourse communities can use communication methods like Carrds to advance their goals,\u201d but in your own words.\tComment by Glenn Lester: Peer reviewer provides specific suggestions and explains why they would help.<\/p>\n

\tOverall, your first three paragraphs flow pretty well. I think you need to solidify exactly what you\u2019re writing about as well as providing more examples of \u201cStan Twitter\u201d communication methods as it\u2019s mainly focused on Carrds.<\/p>\n

\tA few other suggestions and reminders you should keep in mind. You used sources that described your discourse community, but none of the readings we used in class were used in your paper. Should be a simple fix, like listing what quality of discourse community you\u2019d like to focus on then explaining how something relates back to the concept of discourse community. You have visual aids, which is great, but they may be a bit small for a reader. I can\u2019t really read the BYF and DFI sections of either of the images even though I\u2019m using a rather large monitor. I\u2019d recommend having a title that better encompasses what your paper is about, like \u201cThe Discourse Community of Stan Twitter\u201d or something of that nature. I also recognize many instances where you reference a celebrity but don\u2019t really describe who they are. For instance, you say BTS quite a bit. Maybe you could clarify that by saying it\u2019s a Korean Pop (K-Pop) group, allowing the reader to get a better idea of what you\u2019re saying. I\u2019d also recommend adopting the IMRaD format as this assignment is more a report than an essay.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The peer reviewer provides specific suggestions and feedback for how the writer can meet the assignment criteria.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The reviewer’s critical feedback is specific and precise and focused on helping the writer revise, not finding fault.<\/p>\n

\tYou are doing a great job and you are definitely on the right track! Feel free to reach out to me through Canvas if you have any further questions.\tComment by Glenn Lester: The reviewer offers to continue to assist the writer.<\/p>\n

Sincerely,
\nWes<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dear Mikayla, Thanks for posting your peer review in the discussion thread and letting me review it! I hope the feedback I provide is useful and can be used in your final draft. Comment by Glenn Lester: The peer reviewer formats their review as a letter. Comment by Glenn Lester: The reviewer starts by thanking […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132868\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}