{"id":113719,"date":"2023-01-28T20:05:43","date_gmt":"2023-01-28T20:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/patient-education-project-tool-informatic-herzing-university-minneapolis\/"},"modified":"2023-01-28T20:05:43","modified_gmt":"2023-01-28T20:05:43","slug":"patient-education-project-tool-informatic-herzing-university-minneapolis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/patient-education-project-tool-informatic-herzing-university-minneapolis\/","title":{"rendered":"Patient education project tool | informatic | Herzing University–Minneapolis"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

You will design a patient education tool that can be used by nurses for teaching patients using computer applications.<\/strong><\/u> You will then present your tool to the class and explain the purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.<\/p>\n

DUE DATE:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Total Points: 200<\/strong><\/p>\n

Patient Education Project Tool Rubric – 100 points<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Points<\/strong><\/p>\n

18-20<\/strong><\/p>\n

14-17<\/strong><\/p>\n

10-16<\/strong><\/p>\n

0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Use of Computer Applications<\/strong><\/p>\n

Creative, \u00a0\u00a0innovative, effective use of computer applications<\/p>\n

Effective use of computer \u00a0\u00a0applications<\/p>\n

Ineffective \u00a0\u00a0use of computer use of applications<\/p>\n

Lacking \u00a0\u00a0use of computer applications<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Organization<\/strong><\/p>\n

Extremely \u00a0\u00a0well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from \u00a0\u00a0one idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the \u00a0\u00a0effectiveness of the project<\/p>\n

Well \u00a0\u00a0organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one \u00a0\u00a0idea to another and conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of \u00a0\u00a0the project<\/p>\n

Somewhat \u00a0\u00a0organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not \u00a0\u00a0always smooth, which at times distracted the audience<\/p>\n

Choppy \u00a0\u00a0and confusing; format was difficult to follow transitions of ideas were \u00a0\u00a0abrupt and seriously distracted the audience<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Content \u00a0\u00a0Accuracy<\/strong><\/p>\n

100 % of \u00a0\u00a0the facts are accurate\u00a0<\/p>\n

99-90% \u00a0\u00a0of the facts are accurate\u00a0<\/p>\n

89-80% \u00a0\u00a0of the facts are accurate<\/p>\n

Fewer \u00a0\u00a0than 80% of facts are accurate<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Research<\/strong><\/p>\n

Went \u00a0\u00a0above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to \u00a0\u00a0what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance \u00a0\u00a0project; and utilized variety of resources to make project effective<\/p>\n

Did a \u00a0\u00a0very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full \u00a0\u00a0potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance project; at time took the \u00a0\u00a0initiative to find information outside of school.<\/p>\n

Used \u00a0\u00a0the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any \u00a0\u00a0additional resources<\/p>\n

Did \u00a0\u00a0not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the \u00a0\u00a0topic<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Creativity<\/strong><\/p>\n

Was \u00a0\u00a0extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly \u00a0\u00a0enhanced the project<\/p>\n

Was \u00a0\u00a0clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented<\/p>\n

Added \u00a0\u00a0a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate them \u00a0\u00a0throughout<\/p>\n

Little \u00a0\u00a0creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked \u00a0\u00a0\u201czip\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Patient Education Project Class Presentation Rubric: 100 points<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Points<\/strong><\/p>\n

18-20<\/strong><\/p>\n

14-17<\/strong><\/p>\n

10-13<\/strong><\/p>\n

5-9<\/strong><\/p>\n

0-4<\/strong><\/p>\n

Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Voice<\/strong><\/p>\n

Speaker uses appropriate pitch, \u00a0\u00a0volume, and rate of speaking. Articulation excellent.<\/p>\n

Hasty conversational style; \u00a0\u00a0does not interfere with volume or articulation. Communication is unhampered.<\/p>\n

Low volume; hasty \u00a0\u00a0conversational style compromises articulation and communication.<\/p>\n

Speech difficult to hear or \u00a0\u00a0understand; communication is severely compromised.<\/p>\n

Speaker is inaudible, and\/or \u00a0\u00a0speech is garbled, impeding communication.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Gestures and Audience Engagement<\/strong><\/p>\n

Eyes, hands, facial expression, \u00a0\u00a0and body language all coordinate to support communication.<\/p>\n

Eye contact is adequate. Facial and body language are neutral.<\/p>\n

Eye contact and facial \u00a0\u00a0expressions are minimal; gestures and body language distracting.<\/p>\n

No eye contact; speaker is \u00a0\u00a0stationary, or is supported by lectern.<\/p>\n

No eye contact, speaker is \u00a0\u00a0rigid, head down, or is unable to continue.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Speech Content<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction explains the \u00a0\u00a0purpose of the tool, previews speech.<\/p>\n

Body clearly explains how you \u00a0\u00a0created it and the reasoning for choice of tools.<\/p>\n

Conclusion ties presentation \u00a0\u00a0together.<\/p>\n

Speech is prepared, organized \u00a0\u00a0into an introduction, body, and conclusion, with minimal transitional \u00a0\u00a0devices.<\/p>\n

Speech is obviously prepared \u00a0\u00a0and researched, but has no discernible intro, body, and\/or conclusion and \u00a0\u00a0lacks interlocking thoughts.<\/p>\n

Speech has an impromptu effect, \u00a0\u00a0with no discernible parts or transitions; is obviously poorly researched and \u00a0\u00a0unprepared.<\/p>\n

Speech is unprepared, not \u00a0\u00a0researched, and is obviously an impromptu presentation.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Evidence Support<\/strong><\/p>\n

Research used from appropriate \u00a0\u00a0sources<\/p>\n

Research used, but not from \u00a0\u00a0appropriate sources<\/p>\n

.<\/p>\n

No research support provided<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Length of presentation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Presentation is 5-10 minutes in \u00a0\u00a0length<\/p>\n

Presentation is <5 minutes \u00a0\u00a0or>10 minutes in length<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

You will design a patient education tool that can be used by nurses for teaching patients using computer applications.<\/strong><\/u> You will then present your tool to the class and explain the purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.<\/p>\n

DUE DATE:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Total Points: 200<\/strong><\/p>\n

Patient Education Project Tool Rubric – 100 points<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Points<\/strong><\/p>\n

18-20<\/strong><\/p>\n

14-17<\/strong><\/p>\n

10-16<\/strong><\/p>\n

0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Use of Computer Applications<\/strong><\/p>\n

Creative, \u00a0\u00a0innovative, effective use of computer applications<\/p>\n

Effective use of computer \u00a0\u00a0applications<\/p>\n

Ineffective \u00a0\u00a0use of computer use of applications<\/p>\n

Lacking \u00a0\u00a0use of computer applications<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Organization<\/strong><\/p>\n

Extremely \u00a0\u00a0well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from \u00a0\u00a0one idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the \u00a0\u00a0effectiveness of the project<\/p>\n

Well \u00a0\u00a0organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one \u00a0\u00a0idea to another and conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of \u00a0\u00a0the project<\/p>\n

Somewhat \u00a0\u00a0organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not \u00a0\u00a0always smooth, which at times distracted the audience<\/p>\n

Choppy \u00a0\u00a0and confusing; format was difficult to follow transitions of ideas were \u00a0\u00a0abrupt and seriously distracted the audience<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Content \u00a0\u00a0Accuracy<\/strong><\/p>\n

100 % of \u00a0\u00a0the facts are accurate\u00a0<\/p>\n

99-90% \u00a0\u00a0of the facts are accurate\u00a0<\/p>\n

89-80% \u00a0\u00a0of the facts are accurate<\/p>\n

Fewer \u00a0\u00a0than 80% of facts are accurate<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Research<\/strong><\/p>\n

Went \u00a0\u00a0above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to \u00a0\u00a0what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance \u00a0\u00a0project; and utilized variety of resources to make project effective<\/p>\n

Did a \u00a0\u00a0very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full \u00a0\u00a0potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance project; at time took the \u00a0\u00a0initiative to find information outside of school.<\/p>\n

Used \u00a0\u00a0the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any \u00a0\u00a0additional resources<\/p>\n

Did \u00a0\u00a0not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the \u00a0\u00a0topic<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Creativity<\/strong><\/p>\n

Was \u00a0\u00a0extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly \u00a0\u00a0enhanced the project<\/p>\n

Was \u00a0\u00a0clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented<\/p>\n

Added \u00a0\u00a0a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate them \u00a0\u00a0throughout<\/p>\n

Little \u00a0\u00a0creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked \u00a0\u00a0\u201czip\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Patient Education Project Class Presentation Rubric: 100 points<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Points<\/strong><\/p>\n

18-20<\/strong><\/p>\n

14-17<\/strong><\/p>\n

10-13<\/strong><\/p>\n

5-9<\/strong><\/p>\n

0-4<\/strong><\/p>\n

Comments<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Voice<\/strong><\/p>\n

Speaker uses appropriate pitch, \u00a0\u00a0volume, and rate of speaking. Articulation excellent.<\/p>\n

Hasty conversational style; \u00a0\u00a0does not interfere with volume or articulation. Communication is unhampered.<\/p>\n

Low volume; hasty \u00a0\u00a0conversational style compromises articulation and communication.<\/p>\n

Speech difficult to hear or \u00a0\u00a0understand; communication is severely compromised.<\/p>\n

Speaker is inaudible, and\/or \u00a0\u00a0speech is garbled, impeding communication.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Gestures and Audience Engagement<\/strong><\/p>\n

Eyes, hands, facial expression, \u00a0\u00a0and body language all coordinate to support communication.<\/p>\n

Eye contact is adequate. Facial and body language are neutral.<\/p>\n

Eye contact and facial \u00a0\u00a0expressions are minimal; gestures and body language distracting.<\/p>\n

No eye contact; speaker is \u00a0\u00a0stationary, or is supported by lectern.<\/p>\n

No eye contact, speaker is \u00a0\u00a0rigid, head down, or is unable to continue.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Speech Content<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction explains the \u00a0\u00a0purpose of the tool, previews speech.<\/p>\n

Body clearly explains how you \u00a0\u00a0created it and the reasoning for choice of tools.<\/p>\n

Conclusion ties presentation \u00a0\u00a0together.<\/p>\n

Speech is prepared, organized \u00a0\u00a0into an introduction, body, and conclusion, with minimal transitional \u00a0\u00a0devices.<\/p>\n

Speech is obviously prepared \u00a0\u00a0and researched, but has no discernible intro, body, and\/or conclusion and \u00a0\u00a0lacks interlocking thoughts.<\/p>\n

Speech has an impromptu effect, \u00a0\u00a0with no discernible parts or transitions; is obviously poorly researched and \u00a0\u00a0unprepared.<\/p>\n

Speech is unprepared, not \u00a0\u00a0researched, and is obviously an impromptu presentation.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Evidence Support<\/strong><\/p>\n

Research used from appropriate \u00a0\u00a0sources<\/p>\n

Research used, but not from \u00a0\u00a0appropriate sources<\/p>\n

.<\/p>\n

No research support provided<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Length of presentation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Presentation is 5-10 minutes in \u00a0\u00a0length<\/p>\n

Presentation is <5 minutes \u00a0\u00a0or>10 minutes in length\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0here is the other format.<\/p>\n

You will design a patient education tool that can be used by nurses for teaching patients using computer applications<\/strong><\/em>. You will then present your tool to the class and explain the purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.<\/p>\n

Assignment File(s)<\/h3>\n

Rubric<\/h2>\n

NM 208 Patient Education Project Tool<\/strong>NM 208 Patient Education Project ToolCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Computer Applications20.0<\/strong> to >17.0<\/strong> ptsHigh ProficiencyCreative, innovative, effective use of computer applications17.0<\/strong> to >14.0<\/strong> ptsModerately High ProficiencyEffective use of computer applications14.0<\/strong> to >10.0<\/strong> ptsProficient PointsIneffective use of computer use of applications10.0<\/strong> to >0<\/strong> ptsLow-Level Proficiency\/Non-ProficientLacking use of computer applications<\/strong>20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization20.0<\/strong> to >17.0<\/strong> ptsHigh ProficiencyExtremely well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project17.0<\/strong> to >14.0<\/strong> ptsModerately High ProficiencyWell organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project14.0<\/strong> to >10.0<\/strong> ptsProficient PointsSomewhat organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted the audience10.0<\/strong> to >0<\/strong> ptsLow-Level Proficiency\/Non-ProficientChoppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow transitions of ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the audience<\/strong>20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Accuracy20.0<\/strong> to >17.0<\/strong> ptsHigh Proficiency100 % of the facts are accurate17.0<\/strong> to >14.0<\/strong> ptsModerately High Proficiency99-90% of the facts are accurate14.0<\/strong> to >10.0<\/strong> ptsProficient Points89-80% of the facts are accurate10.0<\/strong> to >0<\/strong> ptsLow-Level Proficiency\/Non-ProficientFewer than 80% of facts are accurate<\/strong>20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch20.0<\/strong> to >17.0<\/strong> ptsHigh ProficiencyWent above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance project; and utilized variety of resources to make project effective17.0<\/strong> to >14.0<\/strong> ptsModerately High ProficiencyDid a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance project; at time took the initiative to find information outside of school.14.0<\/strong> to >10.0<\/strong> ptsProficient PointsUsed the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any additional resources10.0<\/strong> to >0<\/strong> ptsLow-Level Proficiency\/Non-ProficientDid not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the topic<\/strong>20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreativity20.0<\/strong> to >17.0<\/strong> ptsHigh ProficiencyWas extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly enhanced the project17.0<\/strong> to >14.0<\/strong> ptsModerately High ProficiencyWas clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented14.0<\/strong> to >10.0<\/strong> ptsProficient PointsAdded a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate them throughout10.0<\/strong> to >0<\/strong> ptsLow-Level Proficiency\/Non-ProficientLittle creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked \u201czip\u201d<\/strong>20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0Previous<\/a>Next<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0\u00a0 You will design a patient education tool that can be used by nurses for teaching patients using computer applications. You will then present your tool to the class and explain the purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness of this patient education. This […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-113719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assignmenttutors.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}